Select Page

Task Group Proposal Review Form-2025

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Task Group Proposal Review...

Task Group Proposal Review Form 2025

Please answer the questions below. Where requested, please provide both numerical evaluation and comments. We recognize the limits of numerical evaluation – this is why your comments will be particularly valuable. Nevertheless, it is useful to have some approximation to an objective grading. Please use numerical grades as follows, adapted according to the specificities of each question: 5: Extremely highly rated against this criterion. 4: Very highly rated, may be improved in very minor ways against this criterion. 3: Highly rated, but could be improved in a number of respects against this criterion. 2: Good in some respects, but could be improved significantly against this criterion. 1: Poor: proposal requires substantial work to meet an acceptable level in regard to this criterion. 0: Proposal does not meet an acceptable standard against this criterion.

Name of Reviewer(Required)
Please state your overall rating of this Task Group proposal. Would this Task Group be a valuable addition to CODATA’s portfolio of initiatives?
How well is the proposed Task Group likely to contribute to CODATA’s strategic priorities as laid out in the call for Task Groups? Is the proposed work relevant, timely and important?
Please rate the feasibility of the work plan proposed. How likely is the proposed Task Group to deliver on its objectives? Where appropriate, please consider the current track record of the Task Group in making this assessment?
Please rate the merits of the deliverables proposed. What do you see as the most significant short- or long-term benefits of the proposed Task Group activities?
Does the proposal include appropriate collaboration with other organisations or groups? Will the proposed work duplicate or complement other activities? Should collaboration or coordination with other organisations or groups be suggested?
Is the proposed membership sufficiently expert and representative from a scientific, disciplinary, gender, and/or geographic perspective for the planned work? Does the proposed membership include early career researchers, as encouraged by the Call for Task groups? Do you have suggestions of other possible members to consider?
Are there promising proposals or suggestions for further sources of funding and support (outside of CODATA) to augment the activities of the group?
Where applicable, how do you rate the deliverables achieved by this Task Group since October 2023 in terms of their contribution towards CODATA’s mission and objectives as laid out in the accompanying documents? To what extent did the Task Group deliver on what it promised?
Please make any additional comments you think pertinent to the evaluation of the proposal. In particular, please make any recommendations for how the proposal might be improved.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.