Author Archives: codata_blog

Getting off at the right station: reflections on AI readiness

Cyrus Walther is a doctoral student in the Astroparticle Physics Group at TU Dortmund University; nominated by IUPAP, he has served on the CODATA Executive Committee since 2023. He contributes actively to CODATA’s Early Career Group, CODATA Connect, and to the Task Group on Digital Representation of Units of Measure (DRUM).

From the 19th to the 21st of October, the International Science Council (ISC), in collaboration with the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Technology (CAST), welcomed the international scientific community to Beijing for the Beijing Science Dialogue. During these three days, topics of transformative impact on science were discussed, among them Artificial Intelligence. As AI especially impacts early- and mid-career researchers, EMCRs from the ISC community suggested including young panellists on the topic. Following a nomination, I had the great honour to receive that invitation from the International Science Council to speak as an early-career scientist on the panel “Responsible AI for global challenges”.

With the exceptional panel speakers and our outstanding moderator discussing a highly relevant and spotlighted topic like AI, we expected people to have high interest and diverse perspectives. However, none of us on stage foresaw that especially one contribution would remain in the audience’s memory of this panel: the bus metaphor.

During the introductory round, we were asked to provide a short input focusing on our perspective on how AI transforms science. For this input, I chose to highlight the development of young people utilizing AI from an inside perspective using a metaphor that goes like this:
___

Imagine you want to climb a mountain. You travel to the small mountain village at the foot of the mountain that you want to hike up. As you arrive, you meet a lovely senior lady, maybe around 95 years old, and she happily shares her impressions about the amazing views at the summit. Affirmed by the lady, you are ready to start your hike in the morning. The next morning, you find out that there is a bus that takes you to the start of the hiking trail. “That sounds marvellous”, you think, and you start looking for the bus station and you find it close by. Not long after, the bus arrives. It looks good and the bus driver is very friendly, so you go inside. The bus is indeed very comfy and warm, and from the inside you have a great view of the mountain panorama outside. Stunned, you watch the trees go by and the beautiful mountain ranges in the distance. Then, it suddenly strikes you: you have missed your stop. The bus is already far up the mountain. So you scream, “Sorry, sorry, I missed my stop. I need to get off.” The bus driver answers, “No problem”, stops the bus and opens the door. As you get off the bus, happy about the fact that you noticed, you start feeling the cold wind around you. You look up the mountain; it is already foggy, cold, and quite steep. “But this is what I signed up for”, you mumble, and you start hiking. After 50 meters, you are out of breath, sweating, and freezing. Frustrated, you turn around to the bus driver, who is luckily still there and happily welcomes you back. After all, you want to see the summit. The senior lady said it was so nice, so you will just take the bus there. When you get on the bus, it is warm and dry again, and so comfortable. You are convinced this was a good decision. Some time passes and the bus stops. “We arrived at the summit, the bus driver says.” Excited, you jump off the bus. Stepping outside, you glance at the beautiful view that is presented to you; the senior lady did not lie. “Stunning!” you say to yourself just as a gust of wind almost blows you off your feet. That’s when you notice the bone-chilling cold around you as the warmth of the bus slowly fades away. Only a few seconds go by and it becomes unbearable – strong winds and freezing cold. You realize you are out of your depth, completely unprepared for the harsh environment on the summit…
You might ask, why is this story relevant? What is the kicker? The bus was warm, the bus was nice, right? The bus was called ChatGPT.

___

From this metaphor, one can and should ask the question of whether Artificial Intelligence is not only transforming science on its own, but primarily the scientists themselves, especially when it comes to Generative AI.

While the metaphor has various flaws, it remains relatable to scientists independent of their career stage. Now, one might think, “Yes, everybody already forgot to get off at the right station.” While this is surely correct, the metaphor relates much further, towards comfort and the warmth of the bus. Its feeling might be mimicked in doomscrolling while already having to leave for an appointment; in sleeping in because the bed is cozy although one has calls scheduled; or in choosing the frozen pizza dinner over a home-cooked meal. More specifically, to extend the metaphor: now at the top of the mountain, unaccustomed to the cold and the harsh environment, could you find your way down without the help of the bus? Faced with another mountain, but deprived of a bus service, could you manage to get to the top? Is the comfort and warmth of the bus depriving you of the opportunity to adapt to the alpine environment, to learn to navigate and climb on your own so when forced to descend from the bus you can find your own way?

After the panel, I was approached by various colleagues from the community, expressing their interest in the metaphor and stating their intention to use it in their teachings. Amongst many great pieces of feedback for which I am deeply grateful, one piece stood out to me. It was when a senior colleague approached me during a coffee break later that day because she realized something. She told me, “I am on the bus; I just realized it, Cyrus. I am on the bus.”


This remains the key insight of the story of the bus and the mountain: it is the awareness to understand where you are right now, on the bus, about to get on, halfway up the mountain avoiding the bus, or already on your way down from the peak. Then, as soon as you are aware of where you are, it is about acknowledging it, identifying where you want to go and potentially changing your path.

So, the question remains: Are you on the bus and do you know when to get off? :)

Thank you very much for reading until here.
All the best!

The panel was chaired by Françoise Baylis (President, Royal Society of Canada, ISC Governing Board member). The other panellists were: Andrew Deeks (President, International Association of Universities); Emna Harigua (Researcher, Institut Pasteur de Tunis); Liu Xuan (Director of Institute of Innovative Environment, CAST, and member of the ISC Committee for Freedom and Responsibility in Science).

A Better Future for Science? Reflections from Beijing

Dr. Pragya Chaube is Assistant Professor at the UPES University, India. She is a co-chair of the CODATA Connect Early Career Network and co-founder Open Science South Asia Network (OSSAN). Pragya’s participation in the International Science Council’s (ISC) Midterm Membership Meeting and Beijing Science Dialogue was kindly supported by the ISC and by the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST).

I had the opportunity to spend the week of 19–24 October in Beijing, alongside a large gathering of scientists and representatives of national science academies from across the globe, reflecting on the future of science. More than 1,000 people from over 80 countries and regions came together for these discussions. We welcomed a new ISC President, Robbert Dijkgraaf, and, on the final day, adopted the Beijing Science Declaration: Science in a Complex World, Science for a Better Future.

The meeting covered many important issues, but I left Beijing reflecting on a question that connects many of them for me: What kind of research ecosystem do we want to build for the future, and what needs to change to get there?

From declarations to implementation

The Beijing Science Declaration is ambitious and well put together. Its 18 commitments cover scientific freedom, responsible AI, public trust, and a stronger role for science in what follows the 2030 Agenda. It sets an important vision for science and society. I did, however, feel that the consultation period was quite short. The draft was shared with us on 13 October, with responses requested by 19 October. A little more time could have allowed for deeper reflection and discussion.

More broadly, I found myself thinking about what comes after a declaration is adopted.

We often agree on what we want to achieve. The next question is how we get there. Open science is one example. It needs infrastructure, sustained funding and viable financial models. It also requires institutions to recognise and reward open practices.

The declaration establishes long-term commitment towards openness. Developing practical ways to deliver on its commitments is just as important.

Open science in the age of AI

One question raised by the new ISC President, Robbert Dijkgraaf, stayed with me. In his speech, he asked whether open science is still the right approach when AI systems can use the same data. “Are we being naïve …?”

It is an important question. It does not mean that we should abandon open science. Rather, it asks us to think more carefully about the systems that support it.

Who benefits when research data is openly available? Who controls how it is reused? How do we ensure that communities retain a say in the use of their data? These questions matter particularly for data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance. Openness needs to work alongside principles such as CARE, which emphasise collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility and ethics.

As AI changes how knowledge is produced and used, we need to reconsider how our systems can support openness while ensuring accountability and equitable benefits.

Science in a world of geopolitical tensions

Geopolitical tensions make international scientific cooperation more difficult. I felt that there was scope to give greater attention to the role of science diplomacy in addressing these challenges.

The declaration recognises scientific and academic freedom, including the right of researchers to cooperate internationally. This is important. But how do we turn this commitment into practice when researchers face visa barriers, restrictions on mobility and political tensions between countries? The ability to collaborate should not depend so heavily on where a researcher comes from. There is room for greater advocacy and international cooperation to address these barriers.

There is also another dimension to the digital divide. A country’s AI capacity depends not only on its own skills, infrastructure and investment. It is also shaped by where AI hardware and software companies are based and who controls these technologies. Because these companies sit in only a few countries, geopolitical tensions between nations can quickly become barriers for researchers elsewhere. Access to chips, computing power or AI tools can be restricted, become costly, or change overnight, regardless of a country’s own capacity. These questions deserve attention when we discuss equitable participation in AI. Science diplomacy could help us think about these global dependencies and how they affect the future of scientific cooperation.

Science as a public good

The meeting included a panel on science as a public good. This is an important principle, and one that the Beijing Science Declaration rightly emphasises. But what does it mean for the kind of science we choose to fund?

In his speech, Robert Dijkgraaf made an important point about the pressures facing fundamental research. In many countries, the demand for immediate economic returns and new technologies is leaving less room for curiosity-driven research. Yet some of our most transformative technologies have emerged from research that was not originally driven by a specific application.

This is particularly relevant for low- and middle-income countries, where the emphasis on solving immediate societal challenges can sometimes overshadow the importance of basic research. These challenges are real and deserve attention. But we must also make space for research whose value we cannot predict in advance.

Fundamental research is also a global public good. Its benefits do not stop at national borders. This makes me wonder whether science diplomacy could play a greater role in building international support for research that individual countries may struggle to prioritise or fund on their own.

Thinking about the research ecosystem we want

For me, the biggest takeaway from Beijing was how interconnected these questions are.

The openness of research, the use of AI, the skills we want future researchers to develop, and the way we fund and assess science cannot be considered separately.

If AI changes how research is conducted, we need to think about the skills researchers will need. If we want more open and collaborative research, we need institutions that support these practices. And if we want researchers to take on new responsibilities, we need to consider what our research assessment systems reward.

Research assessment reform is therefore an important part of this conversation. We cannot expect the research ecosystem to evolve if the incentives remain unchanged.

This also brings me to the role of early- and mid-career researchers (EMCRs).

The EMCRs had a dedicated programme during the meeting. It included a half-day session on the first day, an outing on the second, and a full day on Thursday. It was a valuable opportunity to connect with researchers at similar career stages. At the same time, I wondered whether there could have been more opportunities for EMCRs to participate in the main discussions, particularly those on science policy and the future of research. A dedicated programme has its value. But so does being part of the wider dialogue, alongside those shaping science policy today.

If we are thinking about the future of science, we should also think about how the next generation of researchers can help shape it. This means giving them opportunities not only to develop new skills, but also to contribute to the policy discussions that will influence their careers and the research environments in which they work.

The Beijing Science Declaration sets out an ambitious vision. The work ahead is to translate that vision into practice, through sustained funding, institutional change, international cooperation and a willingness to rethink how we value science. For me, the bigger question is how we shape the research ecosystem that will enable future generations of researchers to realise this vision.

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: October 2026 Edition

From local resilience to systemic risk governance

Households can prepare for floods, but they cannot decide where development happens upstream, how regional power networks are protected, or whether capital keeps flowing into hazard-prone land. Writing for International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, Bapon Fakhruddin argues that where disaster impacts are felt should not be confused with who produces the risk. He separates risk creation, risk transmission and risk bearing, noting that those who benefit from a development decision are often not those who bear its consequences. His Local-to-Systemic Risk Governance framework proposes financed local resilience compacts, which pair local responsibility with real decision rights and predictable funding, alongside investment appraisals that make trade-offs explicit. Resilience is experienced locally, he concludes, but it is not produced locally alone.

UN calls for greater investment in housing resilience as homes account for 43% of reported disaster losses

Homes account for 43% of the direct economic disaster losses countries report through the Sendai Framework Monitor, and around half of everyone affected by disasters had their home damaged or destroyed. Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure modelling puts average annual losses to residential buildings from cyclones, floods, tsunamis and earthquakes at roughly US$228 billion, more than half of estimated losses across the world’s building stock from those hazards. Released for International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, UNDRR’s message is that progress on cutting disaster deaths hasn’t been matched by progress on reducing the number of people affected or the economic cost. The UNDRR argues that this won’t change until homes get safer. The fix: risk-informed locations, enforced building standards, retrofits, and rebuilding to higher standards.

When El Niño hits home: Building household resilience ahead of a record-breaking climate event

As a very strong El Niño unfolds, raising the risk of severe weather into 2027, who ends up paying the disaster bill? Mostly households, argue the authors of a UN report. Post-Disaster Needs Assessments from 20 Asia-Pacific countries show that around 40% of disaster impacts fall on social and productive sectors such as housing, health, education and livelihoods. Forecasts now give at least six months’ lead time, but information only helps if families have the means to act on it. The authors set out three priorities for governments: turn forecasts into practical guidance, make home retrofits, insurance and other risk reduction affordable, and strengthen climate-responsive social protection.

Resilience starts at home: Building a safer future in Latin America and the Caribbean

With 81.2% of its population living in cities, Latin America and the Caribbean is one of the world’s most urbanised regions, and rapid, unplanned growth leaves many families building homes in places exposed to hurricanes, earthquakes and floods. The United Nations Development Programme shares three responses. In Havana, disaster risk was built into Old Havana’s housing strategy, alongside affordable designs that preserve heritage and use local materials. After Hurricane Melissa, Jamaica developed master plans for safer land use and trained local builders in resilient construction, while families received psychosocial support and help replacing lost documents. After the June 2026 earthquakes in Venezuela, engineers assessed nearly 1,000 structures to decide when families could safely return home.

Rethinking disaster reconstruction in Nepal: Building back for a changing climate

On 26 August 2026, a glacial lake outburst flood triggered by an avalanche on Mt Langtang Lirung swept through Nepal’s Bhotekoshi and Trishuli river valleys, killing more than 1,400 people. It was the third major flood to hit the region in just over a year. Kshitiz Pokharel asks whether reconstruction should simply restore what was lost or address the changing risks behind it. He argues for three principles: adaptation, with homes and public buildings on raised platforms, flood-resilient bridges and roads, and no-settlement zones near high-risk wetlands; accessibility, so warnings and support reach everyone; and acceptability, consulting communities before plans are finalised. With glaciers melting and extreme events becoming less predictable, past climate records are no longer a reliable guide to future risk.

Water reveals the limits of sustainable finance taxonomies

A taxonomy can help investors identify whether an activity is green, but it cannot determine whether anyone is able to pay for it. Writing for the Alliance for Global Water Adaptation, Bapon Fakhruddin and Kristina Anguelova use water security to illustrate where sustainable finance classifications end—and where financial design must begin. Developing countries spend around US$164.6 billion each year on water, with approximately 91% coming from governments and state-owned enterprises and less than 2% from private sources. Projects such as flood protection and catchment restoration can generate significant public benefits without producing the revenue needed to repay private investors. Cape Town offers one example of how this gap can be addressed. Clearing invasive vegetation from seven priority catchments was estimated to cost one-tenth as much per unit as alternatives such as desalination. A R2.5 billion (South African rand) performance-based bond issued in 2026 also links part of investor returns to independently verified restoration outcomes. Where there is no commercial payer, public budgets and grants remain a legitimate and necessary source of finance.

Planning for the next disaster: Household preparedness in the Houston area

Most Houston-area residents feel ready for the next disaster, but levels of preparedness vary substantially by income. Using measures from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Household Survey, the Kinder Institute assessed household preparedness in spring 2026 across Harris County and, for the first time, Fort Bend and Montgomery counties. The average resident has taken five of the ten preparedness actions FEMA tracks, such as signing up for weather alerts and insuring their property. Four in ten own a generator that can power their home through extended outages, but ownership varies sharply by neighbourhood and income. That matters in a city where millions lost power after Hurricane Beryl in 2024. Higher-earning households feel more prepared and take more preparedness actions, while nearly half of residents in households earning under US$25,000 a year said they would be not at all prepared or not too prepared if a disaster struck. The researchers point to community organisations to help lower-income residents prepare, alongside staying connected to alerts and local networks year-round.

World Risk Poll 2026: From alert to agency: What turns warnings into action

Four in five adults who experienced a disaster in the previous five years received at least one advance warning, but more than a third of those warned were unable to take any protective action. Drawing on more than 143,000 Gallup interviews across 140 countries and territories, Lloyd’s Register Foundation’s report examines exposure to disasters, access to warnings and the ability to act on them. Preparation at home makes a striking difference: 83% of warned adults with both a household disaster plan and a sense of personal agency took action, compared with just 27% of those with neither. Warning coverage reached 64% in low-income countries compared with 84% in upper-middle and high-income countries. At the regional level, Australia and New Zealand recorded the highest regional share of adults reporting disaster impacts, at 31%. The report calls for mobile-based warnings, stronger household preparedness and priority for highly exposed communities with poor warning access.

Strengthening climate resilience through social protection programs

When disaster strikes, the households most at risk are often those least able to absorb the shock. Adaptive social protection links social protection with disaster risk management and climate adaptation, building poor and vulnerable households’ capacity to anticipate, absorb and adapt to shocks so they don’t fall into, or become trapped in, poverty. This Asian Development Bank brief shows what that looks like in practice in Bangladesh, a low-lying deltaic country with 13% of its territory less than 2 metres above sea level. Reforms to its Employment Generation Program for the Poorest, a public works scheme supporting around 400,000 people, now match permitted works to each district’s dominant climate stress, align them with local disaster management plans, locate worksites within 3 km of homes so women can take part safely, and speed up wage payments. Community consultations surfaced barriers that desk reviews had missed. The lesson travels well: resilience can be built through existing national programmes rather than standalone interventions.

Perceiving protection: Public interpretation of institutions in managed flood settings

Why do some households prepare for floods while their neighbours, living behind the same levee, do not? This systematic review of 35 studies published between 2010 and 2024, covering levees, dams, reservoirs and drainage infrastructure across 21 countries, finds the answer often lies in how people see the institutions meant to protect them. Six dynamics emerge: infrastructure as a producer of risk, governance fragmentation and public confusion, preparedness as an interpretive practice, trust and the levee effect, fairness and timing in institutional response, and whether institutions communicate in ways people can recognise. The central finding is that preparedness is not driven solely by risk knowledge or hazard experience, but reflects how institutional action is seen, trusted or contested. For anyone designing flood protection, how it is perceived may matter as much as how well it performs.

19th Congress of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (IUMS 2026)

Microbes rarely feature in disaster risk conversations, yet they underpin food security, carbon sequestration, ecosystem restoration and public health. The 19th IUMS Congress brings together scientists working across bacteriology, virology and mycology under the theme “Beyond the Microscope: AI & Innovation in Microbiology”. Alongside microbial genetics, synthetic biology and clinical science, the programme covers applied microbiology for environmental sustainability, with a strong emphasis on preserving ecosystems and oceans. Listed by the International Science Council, the congress also aims to widen participation from both low- and high-income countries. It sits at the edge of the DRR agenda but is worth following for anyone working where ecosystem health, biological hazards and resilience meet.

Date & location: 4 – 6 November 2026 | Lisbon, Portugal

World Tsunami Awareness Day 2026

In 2011, only 5 of roughly 2,900 elementary and junior-high students in Kamaishi, Japan, died when the Great East Japan tsunami struck, an outcome credited to years of tsunami education and regular drills. This year’s World Tsunami Awareness Day picks up the same thread under the theme “Be Tsunami Ready: Resilience starts with you”. Because waves can arrive before official warnings do, the campaign focuses on recognising natural warning signs, moving immediately to high ground, knowing evacuation routes, preparing household plans, and helping those who need extra support, including children, older people, persons with disabilities and tourists. Events are being held worldwide, and UNDRR is inviting organisations to share their own #GetToHighGround activities.

 Date & location: 5 November 2026 | Global

UN Climate Change Conference (COP31)

The world’s only multilateral decision-making forum on climate change will meet in Antalya. Türkiye’s Murat Kurum has been nominated as COP President, with Australia’s Chris Bowen serving as President of Negotiations. The conference follows October’s Pre-COP, which was hosted in the Pacific by Fiji, Tuvalu and Australia. Negotiators will focus on limiting warming to 1.5°C, helping vulnerable communities adapt and reaching net zero. Adaptation tracking will be under close scrutiny after COP30 in Belém adopted 59 indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation. Business leaders, scientists, Indigenous Peoples and civil society representatives will also join official delegations. Those following the conference remotely can access a daily schedule of events on the UNFCCC website.

Date & location: 9 – 20 November 2026 | Antalya, Türkiye

OpenET Applications Conference 2026

How much water is actually leaving fields, forests and cities through evapotranspiration? OpenET uses satellite data to answer that question at field scale, and this conference brings its user community together with the science and technical teams to share how the data is being put to work. Under the theme “Science & Innovation to Support Sound Water Management”, sessions run across five tracks: accuracy, natural and urban landscapes, regional management, drought and conservation, and on-farm management. The goals are to share lessons across regions and sectors, gather feedback on what users need from the data, and spark new partnerships. Registration details are available on the conference website.

Date & location: 17 – 18 November 2026 | Hyatt Regency, Salt Lake City, USA

Reducing Drought Risk through Prevention, Early Warning and Anticipatory Action

With El Niño-related drought conditions adding pressure on water security, livelihoods and ecosystems, this UNDRR event in Abu Dhabi, held during the 2026 UN Water Conference, looks at how prevention, early warning and anticipatory action can reduce drought risk and accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goal 6. It draws on the Sendai Framework and the 2026 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, which explores the links between drought, floods and food systems. Discussion will centre on partnerships between governments, UN entities, scientific institutions and development partners to strengthen risk-informed water management and drought preparedness. Ministerial representation and high-level participation are expected.

Date & location: 9 December 2026 | ADNEC Centre, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

September 2026: Publications in the Data Science Journal

Title: What Do We Mean by ‘Version’? Actionable Guidelines for the Versioning of Data
Author: Jens Klump, Lesley Wyborn, Mingfang Wu, Dorothea Strecker, Heinz Pampel, Laura Rothfritz
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-037
Title: Toward a Standardized Framework for Benthic Mapping Data and Metadata Integration in Florida
Author: Anna E. Braswell, Vincent Lecours, Xiaohui Qiao, Ana Carolina Peralta Brichtova, Steven D. Meyers, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Brad E. Rosenheim, Brian K. Walker, Gary A. Zarillo, René Baumstark, Yonggang Liu, Dave Reed, Sean Beckwith, John M. Jaeger
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-036

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: September 2026 Edition

Nepal floods: how measuring snow in the Himalayas could help avoid future disasters

The August 2026 glacial flood that killed more than 1,000 people on the Nepal–Tibet border has renewed urgent calls to close a critical knowledge gap: scientists still do not know precisely how much water the Himalayas hold, or how fast that is changing. Home to nearly 90,000 glaciers sustaining ten major river systems, the region underpins the food, energy and water security of six nations. New measurement techniques, including airborne glacier surveys and satellite radar measurements, are emerging, but deployment remains too slow and too sparse. Researchers argue this must be treated with the urgency of a public emergency, with scientific innovation matched by coordinated monitoring networks, cross-border data sharing, and Indigenous knowledge.

Water investments, capital mobilisation, and national water compacts

Capital for water investment exists; the challenge is creating the conditions to deploy it well. Speaking to The Water Diplomat, Dr Bapon Fakhruddin of the Green Climate Fund and Sarah Nedolast of the World Bank’s Global Water Security and Sanitation Partnership argue the real bottleneck is alignment between policy, regulation and financing, and turning national plans into bankable projects. Too often the same projects are funded repeatedly without shifting the paradigm. Nedolast notes only 70% of public water funding gets spent, so building skills and preparing projects must come first. National Water Compacts show countries are committed to this. Fakhruddin sees grounds for optimism: countries are now asking about blended finance, which was not happening five years ago.

Rising sea levels could cost Australians at least $855 billion by 2100

Rising sea levels and storm surges could inflict A$855 billion in economic losses across Australia by 2100, according to landmark research from the University of Melbourne and Australian National University published in Nature Scientific Reports. Under a moderate-emissions scenario, nearly 270,000 properties and two million hectares of land are at risk, with Queensland, Western Australia, and Victoria bearing the heaviest losses. The Gold Coast alone faces A$84.4 billion in projected damages. Critically, these figures are conservative: rapid ice sheet collapse and erosion losses are excluded entirely. Researchers warn that the cheapest option available now is straightforward: stop building in the highest-risk zones.

Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) Version 1.1 Now Final

When questions span multiple disciplines, domain-specific standards fall short of what is needed for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data exchange. The Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) addresses this by establishing a common language for cross-domain metadata exchange, built on existing standards and complementing, rather than replacing, those already in use.

After the initial release of the CDIF version 1.1 Profiles in June, and a subsequent round of testing and implementation, they have now been finalised. The release will henceforth be stable, with all further issues and features addressed in subsequent versions. It is available at https://book.cdif.org/ and https://github.com/Cross-Domain-Interoperability-Framework.

Smarter, faster, better: Building New Zealand’s energy future

New Zealand’s energy infrastructure pipeline is growing, but delivery remains too slow and costly. Glen Nicholson, Chris Perks and James Russell of Tonkin + Taylor argue the problem is method, not volume: teams repeatedly recreate designs and specifications while constructors join too late, surfacing access and supply-chain problems at their most expensive.

The authors call for four shifts: publishing a visible forward programme of works; standardising repeatable design inputs; testing logistics at business case stage; and involving constructors before design closes. Resilience must be embedded from the outset, and the Edgecumbe and Canterbury earthquakes show it pays. Getting energy policy right could add NZ$22 billion a year to GDP by 2035; delivery will decide whether New Zealand captures those gains.

Cape Town’s day zero: How a water crisis built a data-driven city

Nearly a decade after Cape Town came within days of becoming the first major city to run dry, the crisis still offers lessons for fast-growing cities worldwide. Speaking on VoxDevTalks, senior city official Hugh Cole reflects that the two most effective interventions were public communications and network pressure management, not desalination or tariff hikes. More enduringly, the crisis forced Cape Town to rebuild its entire data infrastructure, embedding evidence-based decision-making across city services from water to its COVID-19 response. With climate change increasing drought risk globally, Cole’s message is clear: cities cannot afford to wait for a crisis to start treating data as a public resource.

Harmful information in disasters: Risk communication for safer decisions (Guidance note)

Misinformation and disinformation now rank as the top global risk, and they strike fastest in disasters, where confusion, fear and slow institutional communication create a vacuum for false narratives to fill. This 2026 guidance note from the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction gives communicators and practitioners a practical framework for managing harmful information, from rumours and scams to AI-generated deepfakes, across the disaster cycle. The goal is to reduce harm, not control information, and not every rumour deserves a response. Before a crisis, the work is building trust and partnerships. During one, communicators should pre-emptively warn people about manipulation tricks, communicate uncertainty with “known / unknown / next update” formats, and triage by Reach, Risk and Resonance to decide whether to act, monitor or stay silent. Afterwards, an after-action review closes the loop. The core message: slow approval processes are not just bureaucratic friction but a risk factor.

The Community Capacity Co-design Process (C3P): A framework for hyperlocal community-led disaster preparedness

Most disaster preparedness programmes hand communities a ready-made plan and tell them to follow it. This paper argues that approach misses the point: every neighbourhood has different risks, skills and histories that a one-size-fits-all curriculum often fails to reflect. The authors developed the Community Capacity Co-design Process (C3P), a seven-step framework that puts communities in the driver’s seat: rather than being trained, residents map their own hazards, identify local strengths and gaps, and design a response plan that fits their reality. Built around trauma-informed principles, it is designed to be emotionally safe for people who have already lived through disasters. Tested across seven communities in Australia, Brazil and New Zealand, the framework was well received, with 97% of participants rating activities positively. The authors acknowledge the need for longer-term follow-up to confirm whether communities sustain what they co-designed.

Changes in glacial lakes and associated risks in the China‒Nepal Himalayas

This study presents a quantitative glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risk assessment for the China–Nepal Himalayas (CNH), a transboundary region of 221,876 km² where trade infrastructure and local communities face growing ice-related hazards. Mapping 2,377 glacial lakes across four time periods using Landsat imagery, the authors document a 27% expansion in lake area between 1992 and 2022, driven by accelerating glacier retreat. A machine learning model, trained on High Mountain Asia GLOF records, reliably identified all nine historically documented outburst lakes in the CNH. Downstream, 260 km of roads, 9.35 km of bridges and nine hydropower facilities are exposed. Of 76 potentially dangerous glacial lakes identified, four were classified as very high risk: Peace Lake, Tilicho Lake, Jialong Co and Poiqu No.1. The framework is designed to be transferable to other data-scarce mountain regions.

When climate forces people to move: Bridging the gap between global frameworks and local action

Climate change is not just warming the planet: it is moving people and trapping others in place. Drawing on nearly a decade of field experience across the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Fiji and the Philippines, this practitioners’ brief tackles the gap between global promises on climate migration and practice on the ground. Climate mobility sits between adaptation, disaster risk, migration and development mandates, and often falls through the cracks between them. Five lessons emerge: build climate mobility into permanent government systems rather than time-limited projects; use data that drives decisions; learn from pilots such as Fiji’s rights-based relocation guidelines; provide dedicated funding, as existing climate finance is largely inaccessible to affected communities; and sustain cross-regional peer learning. In fragile contexts such as the Horn of Africa, climate mobility cannot be separated from conflict, food insecurity and humanitarian needs.

An AI-ready, data engineering playbook for FAIR Integration in EOSC and beyond: CDIF4EOSC Workshop, London, Friday 9 October

Co-located with the Research Data Alliance 27th Plenary Meeting, this workshop showcases the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework for the European Open Science Cloud (CDIF4EOSC) project’s effort to turn the CDIF into a practical playbook for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data integration across the EOSC. Three use cases anchor the work, ocean sciences, climate adaptation, and sustainable materials development, supported by AI-assisted FAIRification tools and partnerships including the Australian Research Data Commons. Sessions cover CDIF tutorials, federated infrastructure, AI-readiness, access rights, and data quality. In-person registration has now closed, but the event is still worth following.

Date & location: 9 October 2026 | The Long Room, Kia Oval Cricket Ground, London

International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction 2026

Held on 13 October, the 2026 International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction (IDDRR) focuses on how homes are planned, built, financed and maintained as a determining factor in whether risk is reduced or created. Under the theme “Resilience Starts at Home,” the day calls on governments, the private sector and households to act: enforcing risk-informed building codes, expanding access to affordable insurance, and ensuring early warnings and planning processes reach and include everyone. Events are being held around the world throughout October, so keep an eye out, and you can search for ones in your region on the IDDRR website

Date & location: 13 October 2026 | Global

Beijing Science Dialogue & ISC Midterm Meeting

Part of a wider gathering of more than 250 scientific organisations, the International Science Council (ISC) Midterm Members’ Meeting brings together ISC members and Fellows over two days for business and forward planning. Day one opens with category-based member forums, committee meetings, and a full plenary covering secretariat reports, member forum readouts, and reflections from the outgoing President, closing with a gala dinner. Day two centres on the incoming President’s vision for the next four years, discussion with members, and a formal handover. Optional afternoon side events cover funding challenges for international scientific unions and shaping the post-2030 UN agenda for disaster risk reduction.

Date & location: 22 – 23 October 2026 | Beijing, China

Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction 2026 (SIDEX-ACDR2026)

Held under the theme “Future-Proofing Transboundary Climate and Disaster Risk Reduction through Advanced Technologies for a Resilient Society,” this conference focuses on strengthening cross-border collaboration and using advanced technologies to improve risk assessment, early warning and disaster response across the region. Sessions include a roundtable on progress and remaining challenges in implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) 2015–2030, and a technical session on applying digital transformation to disaster risk reduction in isolated and inaccessible communities. Registration is open.

Date & location: 28 – 30 October 2026 | Singapore EXPO Hall 3 / Peridot Room, Singapore

World Cities Day / Urban October

Held annually on 31 October to close out Urban October, World Cities Day 2026 focuses on urban regeneration as a pathway to adequate housing for all. This year’s theme explores how area-based regeneration, combined with strategies for housing and informal settlements, can deliver inclusive, climate-resilient neighbourhoods, with an emphasis on community-led approaches and safeguards that prevent displacement and ensure existing residents benefit. The event is hosted this year in Fuzhou, China.

Date & location: 31 October 2026 | Fuzhou, China

From Checklists to Crisis Response: CODATA and UNESCO Present the First Global Survey on Data Policies for Times of Crisis

Crises rarely wait for institutions to be ready for them. Floods, epidemics, earthquakes and displacement events unfold across borders, sectors and time zones, and the organisations that respond to them succeed or fail depending on whether they can find, trust and share the right data fast enough. That simple observation sits at the heart of the Data Policies for Times of Crisis (DPTC) Toolkit, developed jointly by UNESCO and the International Science Council’s Committee on Data (CODATA), and it was the common theme of two sessions to which CODATA contributed at the 2026 Global Conference of the International Decade of Sciences for Sustainable Development (IDSSD) in Paris: the ISC session on 16 July ‘Resilient Science for Resilient Societies: Protecting Knowledge and Scientists in Times of Crisis’, and the dedicated UNESCO–CODATA thematic session on 17 July ‘Data policies for times of crisis: Enabling open science for coordinated response’.

Two sessions, one message

CODATA’s DPTC work was presented first at the ISC session on 16 July. In the first panel, Prof Virginia Murray, as chair of the UNDRR-ISC HIP Steering Committee, shared the UNDRR-ISC Hazard Information Profiles update 2025 (HIPs). In the second panel, Prof Burçak Başbuğ gave examples from the recovery process after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes. 

On 17 July, the thematic session at UNESCO Headquarters brought the need for data in times of crises  (DPTC) message to a dedicated 75-minute hybrid slot in Room XI, opened by Dr Ezra Clark (Chief of Section, Research, Governance and Diplomacy, UNESCO) and closed by Dr Simon Hodson (Executive Director, CODATA). Together, the two sessions made the case that open science is not an abstract ideal for times of crisis — it is operational infrastructure, and the DPTC Toolkit is one attempt to help build it.

The DPTC Toolkit itself — a factsheet, a guidance document and a checklist — was published as part of the UNESCO Open Science Toolkit in June 2025. It is grounded in the 2021 UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science and aligned with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, Ethics) and TRUST (Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability, Technology) principles — three frameworks that, taken together, ask not only whether data can be shared, but whether it should be, and on whose terms. 

Putting the Toolkit to the test: the first global survey

The centrepiece of the 17 July session was the presentation of findings from the first global UNESCO-CODATA survey on the implementation of data policies for times of crisis, conducted between March and June 2026 and presented by Ms Rania Sabo (UNESCO) and Prof Burçak Başbuğ Erkan (METU Department of Statistics; Co-Chair, CODATA International Data Policy Committee).

 The response itself was a small victory for the open science community the DPTC Toolkit is trying to serve: 146 completed responses from 60 countries, spanning all five UNESCO regions. Academic and research institutions made up the largest share of respondents (79), followed by the public sector (28), non-profit and civil society organisations (14), the private sector (12), international organisations (7) and others (5) — a spread that suggests crisis data governance is very much everybody’s problem, not a niche concern for any one sector.

One figure captured the gap between principle and practice neatly: 78% of respondents believe a crisis-data checklist would be beneficial, but only 22% report already having one. The open-ended responses filled in why. Respondents converged on capacity building and training (43%), risk governance (40%), interoperability and real-time systems (38%), ethics, TRUST and CARE (36%), operationalisation (36%), and funding and infrastructure (33%) as the areas most in need of attention. 

Behind the percentages were voices that made the gap concrete. 

  • From Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica: the need is for training support and for researchers to be trained “in best practices for risk management.” 
  • From Arba Minch University, Ethiopia: “the lack of standardized data-sharing protocols across countries and agencies often delays coordinated responses.” 
  • From Loughborough University, UK: the opportunity is “to move from high-level principles to operational, crisis-ready data governance frameworks.” 

Other respondents were even blunter. A contributor from a library and information centre in Hungary put it plainly: “we would need more money, more staff — not more regulations and plans.” The Disaster Health Institute in the United States called for academics and researchers to “always be paired with practitioners and field experts.” And from the University of Khartoum, Sudan, came perhaps the sharpest reframing of the whole exercise: the realistic entry point is not “open science” as such, but “data survival and continuity under crisis conditions.”

Three priorities, and a panel to match

From this evidence, three actionable priorities emerged: common standards (48%), training and capacity building (38%), and the value of case studies (36%) — using real examples to test whether the checklist actually holds up in practice, not just on paper. The panel that followed, moderated by Dr Simon Hodson, put these priorities in front of practitioners who live with them daily: Dr Animesh Kumar (UNDRR, Bonn, joining online), Mr Manuel Ricardo Galindo Moreno (UNESCO), Dr Paola Gonzalez Vargas (Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica, online) and Prof Virginia Murray (Co-chair, CODATA International Data Policy Committee; UCL). The discussion translated the survey’s findings — capacity gaps, interoperability gaps, resourcing gaps — into the harder question of what happens next.

Next steps

The session’s expected outcomes point in a consistent direction: identifying priority areas for capacity-building, policy development and pilot implementation tied to the DPTC Toolkit, and strengthening collaboration among the policymakers, researchers, international organisations and practitioners who will need to use it under pressure. The survey results give CODATA and UNESCO an evidence base — rather than an assumption — for where to focus that work: on common standards, on training people rather than just publishing guidance, and on testing the checklist against real case studies rather than treating it as finished. It is intended to explore these priorities through case studies and pilots, which will test the checklist, provide further feedback, and allow the toolkit to be further refined and extended.

A personal reflection, by Mehmet Ali Erkan 

I took part in the 2026 Global Conference of the International Decade of Sciences for Sustainable Development as an Early Career Researcher, with my participation competitively selected and supported by CODATA using its own funds and an Early Career Researcher travel grant from the International Science Council. I am sincerely grateful to CODATA and the International Science Council for the support that made it possible for me to be in the room at UNESCO Headquarters for these sessions, rather than reading about them afterwards. 

My own contribution to the DPTC work was on the analysis side. I reviewed the 146 survey responses quantitatively and qualitatively, and read closely through the open-ended answers to see, in respondents’ own words, where crisis data governance is still falling short. I sat with that material for weeks before the conference, noticing the recurring calls for training, for common standards, and for someone to simply pair researchers with practitioners in the field, and that made the session itself land differently. The numbers and quotes I had already spent time with were suddenly being discussed live, by the people the survey was written for.

That is, I think, what this work is really about. Building a sustainable and equitable future takes more than scientific knowledge on its own. It takes the ability to share data responsibly, collaborate across borders, and translate evidence into action. Being able to contribute to that translation, in a small way, through the DPTC survey is something I am genuinely proud of, and I hope it is only the start of my involvement in this kind of work.

Thank you

We are grateful to UNESCO’s Open Science Team, to the panellists and moderators who gave their time in Paris and online, and to the 146 respondents across 60 countries who took the time to tell us, in their own words, what crisis data governance still needs. We look forward to turning these priorities into the next phase of the DPTC Toolkit’s work.

About the authors

  • Professor B. Burçak Başbuğ,  Co-Chair International Data Policy Committee, CODATA and Faculty Member at the Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara-Türkiye
  • Dr. Simon Hodson, Executive Director of CODATA, the Committee on Data of the International Science Council.
  • Professor Virginia Murray, Co-Chair International Data Policy Committee, CODATA and Chair of the UNDRR-ISC Hazard Information Profiles 2025 update 
  • Ms Rania Sabo, Associate Programme Specialist, Research, Governance, and Diplomacy Section, Sciences Sector, UNESCO 
  • Mehmet Ali Erkan, PhD Researcher, Research and Teaching Assistant in the Department of Statistics at the Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara-Türkiye

August 2026: Publications in the Data Science Journal

Title: Data Management Challenges for Translational Agricultural Research in West Africa: The Case of the Crops Research Institute, Ghana
Author: Joyce Koranteng-Acquah, Sabina Leonelli
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-035
Title: VESA: A Visualization-Enabled Search Application for Exploratory Dataset Discovery
Author: Pawandeep Kaur Betz, Tobias Hecking, Hudaif Mohammad Malikathazham, Andreas Gerndt
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-034
Title: Designing Repository-Level Evaluation Criteria: A Data Stewardship Framework for Research Data Repositories
Author: Sooyeon Han, Suntae Kim, JongGyu Han, Juseop Kim
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-033
Title: Indigenous Governance of Data Held by Organisations: How to Operationalise Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles in Australia
Author: Cassandra Sedran-Price, Riley Taitingfong, Rose Barrowcliffe, Jacob Prehn, Maggie Walter, Gawaian Bodkin-Andrews, Raymond Lovett
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-032
Title: Navigating Gaps in Governance and Capacity for Equitable and Responsible Data Sharing in Health Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Literature Review
Author: Pamela Andanda, Johannes Machinya, Takudzwa Mutomba, Larisha Bedhesi
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-031
Title: A Semantic Web Model for Standardizing FAIR Metrics and Assessment Results
Author: Robert Huber
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-030
Title: The JARDIN Hackathon to Seek Solutions to Overcome Technical Barriers in Health Data Exchange: From the Point of Care to European Registry Networks
Author: César Bernabé, Daphne Wijnbergen, Alberto Cámara, Karolis Cremers, Margarida Magalhães, Daniela Vicentini Albring, Sergi Aguiló-Castillo, Kalia Orphanou, Stella Tamana, Maria Xenophontos, Laura Menotti, Mirco Cazzaro, Ornella Irrera, Joëlle Thonnard, Sander van Boom, Iris C. M. Pelsma, Annika Jacobsen, Andrew Gibson, Veronica Popa, Mark Wilkinson, Marco Roos
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-029
Title: Persistent Identifiers in Germany: Key Findings of a Nationwide Survey
Author: Andreas Czerniak, Steffi Genderjahn, Paul Vierkant, Stephanie Hagemann-Wilholt, Nina Schönfelder, Antonia C. Schrader, Frauke Ziedorn, Barbara K. Fischer, Dirk Pieper, Marc Lange
Download
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-028

 

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: August 2026 Edition

 

A data engineering approach to tracking global climate resilience

What counts as a climate-resilient road? One country might build to withstand a 1-in-50-year flood, another a 1-in-100-year flood, and both report against the same indicator. COP30 in Belém adopted 59 indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation. Bapon Fakhruddin of the Green Climate Fund and Matti Heikkurinen of CODATA warn that figures which look comparable often are not. Their answer is not a single global standard but the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework, which acts as a translator between existing sectoral standards, so communities need not change how they collect data. Building it in from the outset costs far less than retrofitting it and decides whether the Global Stocktake measures genuine progress or merely records the attempt to describe it.

Energy strategy: The path for a prosperous, sustainable future

New Zealand’s electricity supply still turns on how much rain reaches a handful of South Island hydro lakes, and dry years keep exposing how little affordable firming sits behind them. Dr Tim Fisher, Group Managing Director of Tonkin + Taylor, argues the country lacks an energy strategy durable enough to survive successive electoral cycles. The cost is mounting: electricity is 65% more expensive than when the retail market opened in 1999, and project delays have cost NZ$11.8 billion over 25 years. Getting it right could add NZ$22 billion a year to GDP by 2035. Fisher calls for distributed renewable generation, a mandatory firming and flexibility market, gas transition planning, and security of supply that accounts for natural hazards and ageing grid assets.

Climate change is driving widespread marine heat waves across the globe

The largest marine heatwave currently on record covers 63 million square kilometres of the Pacific, roughly 17% of the world’s ocean surface, and climate change is responsible for an estimated 86% of it. It is far from alone. Climate Central finds every major ocean basin running unusually warm: 82.9% of the Mediterranean is under marine heatwave conditions, with parts of the western basin 5-6°C above normal. Those conditions also extend across 39.7% of the Gulf of Mexico, 33% of the Indian Ocean and 23.3% of the Atlantic. Some North Pacific hotspots have now persisted beyond 180 consecutive days. Marine heatwaves are no longer discrete events to be waited out, but a background condition the ocean is increasingly held in.

Droughts: Europe’s economy is paying the price, €439 billion already lost while the damage almost doubles with +2°C

Drought is usually costed as an agricultural problem. Research from the Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC) and Politecnico di Milano suggests that is where the damage starts, not where it ends. The 2015-2018 European drought cost €439 billion, cutting EU-27 and UK GDP per capita growth by 2.72 percentage points, reducing investment by over 12% and leaving 5.8 million jobs uncreated. Critically, the largest losses accumulated over the following six years: agriculture absorbs the initial hit but recovers within a couple of years, while manufacturing and construction keep losing ground long afterwards. At 2°C of warming the same event would cost close to €760 billion, with Spain’s GDP loss rising from 2.2 to 7.7 percentage points.

Japan’s earthquake shows extreme heat can turn one disaster into two

When an earthquake struck Kumamoto in late July, the response unfolded in temperatures that climbed into the high 30s and, in places, hit 40°C for the first time on record. At least 38 people died in the quake; some 7,000 sheltered across 130 evacuation centres with water and power disrupted, and one older woman died of heatstroke while sheltering in her car. Glenn McGregor argues this is a compound event, in which heat acts as a disaster risk multiplier, raising heatstroke risk among evacuees while degrading responders’ physical performance. The comparison is instructive: the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake struck in mild April conditions. The climate a disaster lands in is becoming as consequential as the hazard itself.

Acting before the crisis: The Colombian Red Cross is combining science and anticipation in its response to the El Niño phenomenon

Colombia’s first fully implemented Early Action Protocol did not wait for the drought to arrive. When forecasts from national hydrology and meteorology institute IDEAM showed a greater than 50% probability of below-normal rainfall from June to August, and a Standardised Precipitation Index at or below -1.4, the trigger was met. The Colombian Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) released funds ahead of impact. Some 2,400 people across Tolima and Cesar are being reached: water-retention soil additives for 600 people to stretch irrigation, livestock supplements to prevent deaths during pasture shortages, cash transfers for 900 people without bank accounts, and a community water treatment plant producing 30,000 litres a day. Financed through the anticipatory pillar of the IFRC’s Disaster Response Emergency Fund (DREF), it shows drought response can be pre-agreed and science triggered.

 

A Livable Future: Protecting Jobs and Growth from Extreme Heat in South Asia’s Cities

In South Asia’s cities the night no longer brings relief: urban areas can run up to 10°C hotter after dark than the countryside around them. Covering six countries from Bangladesh to Sri Lanka, this World Bank report finds heat already costs the region the equivalent of 31 million full-time jobs per year. Without adaptation, GDP could be around 7% smaller by 2050, and by 2070 an estimated 520 million people may face at least one month annually of dangerous heat. Fifteen priority interventions are identified across three pillars — infrastructure, policy and private capital — with Ahmedabad’s heat action plan cited as a proven model that cut peak-heat mortality by 47%. The report makes a compelling case that investment in heat adaptation is as much a fiscal priority as a humanitarian one.

The 2025 small island developing states report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: building resilience in the face of rising heat

Small island developing states (SIDS) contribute less than 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions and are among the first to pay for them. Tracking 28 indicators across health impacts, adaptation, mitigation, finance and public engagement, this Lancet Countdown report compares recent exposure with the 2000-09 baseline. Between 2015 and 2024, infants across SIDS were exposed to seven times more heatwave days than that baseline, and older adults five times more. In 2024 alone, 4.4 billion potential work hours were lost to heat. Drought and heat together contributed to food insecurity for around 2.7 million people across 26 SIDS, compounding risks from vector-borne disease and sea-level rise. Adaptation and climate finance remain far short of what that exposure warrants, and the report argues for health-centred resilience as the organising principle for both.

Heat-Resilient Infrastructure: Lessons from Emerging Global Experience

Heatwaves already inflict an estimated US$23.9 billion in annual losses on critical infrastructure globally, and the remedy is not simply more concrete. This multi-author issue gathers field experience, policy perspectives and community voices on building heat resilience into infrastructure and urban systems, with a focus on South Asia. Contributors examine the role of water systems in heat action plans, the cooling potential of urban tree cover and green-blue infrastructure, and thermally comfortable housing design for low-income communities. A review of more than 250 city-level heat action plans across India illustrates both rapid progress and significant implementation gaps. The issue’s central argument is that heat resilience cannot be achieved through infrastructure investment alone: it requires governance reform, sustained finance and genuine engagement with the communities most at risk.

Evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of heat action plans

Cities are writing heat action plans faster than anyone can establish whether they work. Reviewing 34 subnational heat action plans worldwide, this Global Disaster Preparedness Center study finds most handle emergency preparedness, early warning and public health interventions competently, but often lack clear indicators to measure effectiveness and long-term outcomes. Governance, stakeholder coordination, sustainable funding and data availability emerge as the factors separating plans that function from plans that merely exist. To close the measurement gap, the authors developed the Heat Action Plan Implementation and Effectiveness (HAPIE) Tool, which helps local governments define goals, monitor progress and evaluate outcomes using practical, context-specific indicators. Piloted in Seattle, Vienna, Cape Town and Nepalgunj, it offers a route to embedding continuous evaluation in heat resilience planning rather than treating publication as the finish line.

Land-use and atmospheric shifts jointly amplify U.S. drought-driven crop losses

Two things determine how badly a drought hits a harvest: the weather, and what has been planted in its path. Using an integrated multi-scale, multi-sector modelling framework across the contiguous United States, researchers project drought-driven production losses through 2055 rising by almost 60% for corn and 135% for soybean against historical levels. The striking finding is that land-use and land-cover change operates as a driver of comparable magnitude to atmospheric change itself, with the sharpest amplification occurring where cropland expansion overlaps drought-prone regions such as the Great Plains. The implication is uncomfortable but useful: a meaningful share of future drought loss is being locked in right now by land-use decisions, which also means a meaningful share of it remains avoidable.

 

16th Annual Conference of the International Society for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRiM 2026)

Now in its 16th year, IDRiM brings its annual conference to Bali under the theme “Resilient Cities in Multi-Hazard Crises: Bridging Innovation, Implementation Science, and Grassroots Action”. Hosted by the Resilience Development Initiative and the Research Center for Disaster Mitigation at Institut Teknologi Bandung, it draws academics, practitioners, policymakers and community leaders together around urban resilience where several hazards arrive at once. The emphasis on implementation science and grassroots action speaks directly to the gap between what is known about risk and what actually gets built.

Date & location: 5 – 9 September 2026 | Bali, Indonesia

Global Cooling Pledge Assembly 2026

Launched at COP28, the Global Cooling Pledge commits signatories to a triple strategy of passive cooling, super-efficient technologies and climate-friendly refrigerants, targeting a 68% cut in sector emissions by 2050. The Cool Coalition, an initiative of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), hosts the assembly, bringing signatory countries, cities, industry and development finance institutions together to turn that commitment into deployment. Sessions cover national cooling policy, urban heat resilience for cities and subnational governments, and the strategic direction of the Intergovernmental Committee on Cooling, with outcomes intended to shape the global cooling agenda heading into COP31. Access to cooling is the other half of the heat exposure story.

Date & location: 15 – 18 September 2026 | PARKROYAL on Beach Road, Singapore

UNDRR Masterclass series: AI for Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems

Delivered by the Global Education and Training Institute of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) with Google, this three-part online series looks at where AI is genuinely useful in early warning. The sessions cover AI-driven flood prediction (16 September), advances in weather prediction (23 September), and Earth science and impact assessment (30 September). Aimed at governments and humanitarian organisations strengthening early warning and anticipatory action programmes, it was capped at 1,000 participants on a first-come basis, with a certificate for those attending all three sessions. Registration has now closed, but the series is worth noting for anyone tracking where AI is being put to practical use in early warning.

Online registration (now closed): https://undrr.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_buu2Xn0dQ8aSNE6Dc5AOEg

Date & location: 16, 23 & 30 September 2026 | Online

Pacific Symposium on Loss and Damage: Understanding Non-economic Losses

Some losses never reach a balance sheet: language, cultural heritage, sense of place, the ties that hold a community together. This symposium focuses on non-economic loss and damage across the Pacific, and on the harder question of measuring it well enough to inform policy and finance. UNDRR’s Pacific sub-regional office leads it alongside the Pacific Community, the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), the Santiago Network and UN partners. Together they work with governments, regional agencies, civil society, Indigenous Peoples and community leaders to strengthen data systems, policy frameworks and institutional capacity. Attendance is by invitation, but the outputs will be worth following.

Date & location: 28 – 29 September 2026 | Tanoa International Hotel, Nadi, Fiji

Global Heat Forum: Unlocking Solutions to Scale Heat Resilience

The Global Heat Health Information Network runs the forum with support from the World Meteorological Organization, gathering more than 500 policymakers, scientists, funders, community leaders and private sector representatives around a single question: how to scale what already works. The programme spans plenaries, workshops and field visits, with the stated aim of moving past documenting the problem to building an investable roadmap for heat resilience. Pre-registration is open on a rolling basis, and plenaries will be live streamed for those unable to travel.

Date & location: 6 – 9 October 2026 | Bangkok, Thailand + online

July 2026: Publications in the Data Science Journal

Title: Automated Retrieval and Analysis of Finnish Cultural Metadata with finna
Author: Akewak Jeba, Julia Matveeva, Leo Lahti
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-027
Title: Insects in the Mail, a Quantitative Analysis of Charles Robertson’s Scientific Correspondence
Author: Sandi Caldrone, Marcella Lees, Bethany G. Anderson
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-026
Title: Work Plans: A Tool for Suggesting Implementation Strategies to Improve the FAIRness of Data Repositories
Author: Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Ismael Kherroubi Garcia, Christopher Erdmann, Julianne Christopher, Lisa M. Mayer, Darya Pokutnaya, Christine R. Kirkpatrick
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-025
Title: A Structured Examination of Reproducibility: A Case Study for HTS Using the PRIMAD Model and BioCompute Object
Author: Meznah Aloqalaa, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Carole Goble
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-024
Title: MatSci-YAMZ: Integrating Human and Artificial Intelligence Vocabulary
Author: Scott McClellan, Addison Ireland, Colton Gerber, Joel Pepper, Christopher B. Rauch, Mat Kelly, John Kunze, Jane Greenberg
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-023
Title: Indigenous Data Governance – Laying the Groundwork for a Broader Dialogue in the Aftermath of Truth and Reconciliation Committees in Sápmi
Author: Susanna Ragnhild A. Siri, Sara Elle Gaup, Trond Trosterud, Sjur Nøstebø Moshagen, Christina Storm Mienna, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad, Máret J. Heatta, Eva Josefsen, Else Grete Broderstad, Rauna Kuokkanen, Per Axelsson
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-022

 

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: Jul 2026 Edition

Release of the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) Version 1.1

The Committee on Data (CODATA) has released Version 1.1 of the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF), a practical framework that enables organisations across sectors to share and combine data without manual translation. Resulting from two years of implementation and development, including a disaster preparedness initiative in Malawi and implementation in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) climate adaptation project (Climate-Adapt4EOSC), the release strengthens FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data sharing. New features include standardised core data fields, improved packaging tools, and a developer toolkit, with future updates planned to enhance data quality, semantic mapping, and support for complex data and software resources.

Climate risk and disclosure in ports: Lessons from New Zealand and Australia

Climate risk and disclosure in ports: Lessons from New Zealand and Australia
Ports sit on the front line of climate risk, and increasingly on the front line of climate disclosure too. Drawing on a webinar with Lyttelton Port Company, Flinders Port Holdings and Tonkin + Taylor, this article shows how leading ports are turning mandatory climate reporting from a compliance chore into a strategic advantage: sharpening governance, informing investment decisions and building resilience across operations. As reporting regimes mature on both sides of the Tasman, the ports getting ahead are the ones treating disclosure as navigation, not paperwork.
Watch the webinar

Climate adaptation, governance gaps and the future of Europe’s coastal fisheries

The fish are moving; the rules aren’t keeping up. As warming waters push species into new territories, Europe’s fisheries governance, built for a stable ocean, is struggling to adapt. Using the North Sea brown shrimp fishery as a case study, this article makes the case for adaptive governance and climate services such as early warning systems and decision-support tools, so coastal communities can manage change proactively rather than react to it.

Mapping Africa’s changing coastline

Sea-level rise is not uniform, and for Africa’s coastal communities the local details matter. A new interactive platform combines more than a century of data with future climate projections to show how land subsidence, ocean warming and melting ice sheets shape flood risk from one location to the next. The aim is to give governments the site-specific evidence to decide where to strengthen defences, where to build resilience, and where managed relocation may be the wiser path.

Ocean warming, marine heatwaves and sea-level rise pose increasing risk in South-West Pacific region

2025 was the South-West Pacific’s second warmest year on record (behind 2024), and the ocean is bearing the brunt. A new World Meteorological Organization report documents widespread marine heatwaves driving coral bleaching, fisheries disruption and biodiversity loss, alongside the destruction wrought in Indonesia and Malaysia by Cyclone Senyar. Most striking of all: Indonesia’s last tropical glacier could vanish by 2027. The report calls for urgent strengthening of early warning systems, climate services and coordinated adaptation across the region.

Opinion: Financing Early Warning Systems That Deliver and Endure

Drawing on a 2026 independent evaluation of the Green Climate Fund’s (GCF) approach to and Portfolio of Climate Information and Early Warning System Interventions, the authors argue that investment scale alone does not guarantee impact. The GCF is the world’s largest financier of climate information and early warning systems, committing close to two billion US dollars across more than 140 projects in over 100 countries, yet the evaluation finds these investments have grown in isolation, without a unifying framework. The authors highlight that critical gaps remain in decisive stages of system performance, including gaps in communication channels, user-centred design, tailored risk based information, and local preparedness capacity. They call for a shift toward blended finance models, integrated system design, and measuring real-world capability rather than simple coverage.

Mainstreaming Disaster Resilience into Infrastructure Projects

When roads, railways and power networks fail in disasters, the losses ripple across entire economies, and much of that damage is avoidable. Focusing on India’s roads, railways and power sectors, this CDRI report pinpoints where policy, project design, financing and risk assessment fall short. The fixes are practical: embed resilience across the whole infrastructure lifecycle, from planning and procurement through to operation, assess hazards up front, monitor assets in real time using digital systems, and back it all with dedicated financing, insurance and risk-transfer options. The result is a roadmap for reducing economic losses and keeping essential services running, so that future infrastructure keeps standing, and keeps serving, in a changing climate.

Small but mighty — climate resilience in Europe’s small municipalities

Around 40% of the EU’s population lives in municipalities of fewer than 20,000 people, communities that also support much of Europe’s agricultural production and ecosystem services. Yet only 16% of these small municipalities have adaptation plans, compared with 28% of larger ones. This European Environment Agency briefing shows how small towns are punching above their weight through local leadership, partnerships and folding adaptation into plans, budgets and policy, even as limited funding, staffing, technical expertise and access to climate data hold many back. The call is for stronger national and EU support, through funding, knowledge-sharing and capacity building, so no region is left behind.

Physical Vulnerability of The Gambia’s Coastline in the Context of Climate Change

The Gambia’s entire 80 km coastline is under pressure, but some stretches are far more exposed than others. With rising seas, erosion and flooding threatening communities, ecosystems and key industries such as tourism, agriculture and fisheries, knowing where to act first matters. Using the Coastal Vulnerability Index, this study pinpoints the hotspots, from Buniadu Point to Barra and Banjul to Cape Point, where erosion, low-lying terrain and fragile geology converge. The prescription is integrated coastal management: nature-based solutions such as mangrove and wetland restoration, flood-resistant infrastructure, improved drainage, land-use planning and managed retreat from the highest-risk areas, backed by coordinated action across government, communities and regional partners.

The role of the spatial scale in flood hazard and risk mapping for informing land-use planning: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand

Does the scale of a flood map change the decisions it supports? This Aotearoa New Zealand study says yes: regional maps work well for strategic planning and flagging broad areas of concern, but local planning and development decisions demand finer-scale mapping. With extreme rainfall intensifying and development continuing in flood-prone areas, the stakes are rising. The catch is consistency — approaches differ between regions, and there is no clear national guidance on how flood hazard and risk information should be applied in planning, producing uneven outcomes. The authors call for consistent national standards, greater transparency about the limits of each mapping scale, and closer collaboration between planners, scientists and decision-makers.

OntoPortal Workshop 2026 Announced

The OntoPortal Alliance, who develop and maintain open-source ontology repositories that help scientists across disciplines share and reuse structured, machine-readable knowledge, announces its fifth annual gathering in Paris. A free public online session on 23 September features a platform introduction, panel discussion, hands-on tutorial, and a Q&A session. A valuable opportunity for both newcomers and practitioners to explore and discover how ontology tools can improve data interoperability, hear from community members, and discuss future directions.

Online registration: https://zfrmz.eu/bAXGoKYQgWZwTw27fEPr

Online date & location: 23 September 2026 | Zoom (online)

Pacific Webinar on the Global Disaster-Related Statistics Framework (G-DRSF)

Endorsed by the United Nations Statistical Commission in 2026, the Global Disaster-Related Statistics Framework (G-DRSF) offers countries a common foundation for producing, sharing, and using disaster-related data, from loss and damage tracking to Sendai Framework monitoring and risk-informed planning. This webinar introduces the framework and explores what it means in practice for Pacific countries, where data gaps and the growing impacts of climate-related disasters make robust statistical systems especially critical.

Bringing together regional partners and country representatives, the session will feature presentations, a Pacific country panel, and an interactive Q&A, with a focus on how the G-DRSF can strengthen national statistical systems and support regional collaboration going forward.

Date & location: 4 August 2026 | Online

2026 Int’l Symposium on Construction and Disaster Management (CADM 2026)

The International Symposium on Construction and Disaster Management returns this August in Kunming, China, bringing together researchers and practitioners to share the latest findings at the intersection of construction and disaster management. For those working on disaster-resilient infrastructure, risk-informed building practices, and post-disaster reconstruction, CADM 2026 offers a focused forum to exchange methods, results, and emerging approaches.

Date & location: 10 – 12 August 2026 | Kunming, Yunnan Province, China

UNCCD COP17          

Up to 40% of the world’s land is degraded, affecting 3.2 billion people, and this August, the world’s governments will gather in Mongolia to respond. The 17th Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD COP17) brings together delegates from 197 Parties, heads of state, scientists, and civil society to advance action on desertification, land degradation, and drought: three interconnected drivers of disaster.

As the first of the three Rio Convention COPs in 2026, COP17 is expected to set the tone for global ambition on land, climate, and biodiversity this year. For DRR practitioners, it is a critical event to follow closely.

Date & location: 17 – 28 August 2026 | Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

World Water Week 2026 

Organised by the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI), World Water Week 2026 brings together policymakers, practitioners, and researchers under the theme “Water for People and Progress” to advance equitable, climate-resilient water solutions. The programme will address water security, sanitation, and health, with a particular focus on marginalised communities and the intersections of water, gender, and climate change. For those working in disaster risk reduction, where floods, droughts, and water insecurity sit at the heart of community resilience, this is a key event to follow.

Date & location: 23 – 27 August 2026 | Stockholm, Sweden and Online

Creating Effective Warnings For All Workshops 2026

Three focused workshops at University College London are taking place this September. Spanning climate risk communication, health impacts, and community-inclusive approaches, the series covers some of the most pressing challenges in translating warnings into protective action.

The three workshops are:

  • 2 September – Warnings to Action: Aligning Climate Risk Alerts with Climate Change Policy
  • 3 September – Warnings for Health in an Era of Rapid Climate Change
  • 4 September – Knowing Risk: Co-developing Community-Inclusive Early Warning Systems (co-run with the University of Glasgow and Malawi University of Science and Technology).

Date & location: 2 – 4 September 2026 | University College London, UK