Monthly Archives: October 2026

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: October 2026 Edition

From local resilience to systemic risk governance

Households can prepare for floods, but they cannot decide where development happens upstream, how regional power networks are protected, or whether capital keeps flowing into hazard-prone land. Writing for International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, Bapon Fakhruddin argues that where disaster impacts are felt should not be confused with who produces the risk. He separates risk creation, risk transmission and risk bearing, noting that those who benefit from a development decision are often not those who bear its consequences. His Local-to-Systemic Risk Governance framework proposes financed local resilience compacts, which pair local responsibility with real decision rights and predictable funding, alongside investment appraisals that make trade-offs explicit. Resilience is experienced locally, he concludes, but it is not produced locally alone.

UN calls for greater investment in housing resilience as homes account for 43% of reported disaster losses

Homes account for 43% of the direct economic disaster losses countries report through the Sendai Framework Monitor, and around half of everyone affected by disasters had their home damaged or destroyed. Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure modelling puts average annual losses to residential buildings from cyclones, floods, tsunamis and earthquakes at roughly US$228 billion, more than half of estimated losses across the world’s building stock from those hazards. Released for International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, UNDRR’s message is that progress on cutting disaster deaths hasn’t been matched by progress on reducing the number of people affected or the economic cost. The UNDRR argues that this won’t change until homes get safer. The fix: risk-informed locations, enforced building standards, retrofits, and rebuilding to higher standards.

When El Niño hits home: Building household resilience ahead of a record-breaking climate event

As a very strong El Niño unfolds, raising the risk of severe weather into 2027, who ends up paying the disaster bill? Mostly households, argue the authors of a UN report. Post-Disaster Needs Assessments from 20 Asia-Pacific countries show that around 40% of disaster impacts fall on social and productive sectors such as housing, health, education and livelihoods. Forecasts now give at least six months’ lead time, but information only helps if families have the means to act on it. The authors set out three priorities for governments: turn forecasts into practical guidance, make home retrofits, insurance and other risk reduction affordable, and strengthen climate-responsive social protection.

Resilience starts at home: Building a safer future in Latin America and the Caribbean

With 81.2% of its population living in cities, Latin America and the Caribbean is one of the world’s most urbanised regions, and rapid, unplanned growth leaves many families building homes in places exposed to hurricanes, earthquakes and floods. The United Nations Development Programme shares three responses. In Havana, disaster risk was built into Old Havana’s housing strategy, alongside affordable designs that preserve heritage and use local materials. After Hurricane Melissa, Jamaica developed master plans for safer land use and trained local builders in resilient construction, while families received psychosocial support and help replacing lost documents. After the June 2026 earthquakes in Venezuela, engineers assessed nearly 1,000 structures to decide when families could safely return home.

Rethinking disaster reconstruction in Nepal: Building back for a changing climate

On 26 August 2026, a glacial lake outburst flood triggered by an avalanche on Mt Langtang Lirung swept through Nepal’s Bhotekoshi and Trishuli river valleys, killing more than 1,400 people. It was the third major flood to hit the region in just over a year. Kshitiz Pokharel asks whether reconstruction should simply restore what was lost or address the changing risks behind it. He argues for three principles: adaptation, with homes and public buildings on raised platforms, flood-resilient bridges and roads, and no-settlement zones near high-risk wetlands; accessibility, so warnings and support reach everyone; and acceptability, consulting communities before plans are finalised. With glaciers melting and extreme events becoming less predictable, past climate records are no longer a reliable guide to future risk.

Water reveals the limits of sustainable finance taxonomies

A taxonomy can help investors identify whether an activity is green, but it cannot determine whether anyone is able to pay for it. Writing for the Alliance for Global Water Adaptation, Bapon Fakhruddin and Kristina Anguelova use water security to illustrate where sustainable finance classifications end—and where financial design must begin. Developing countries spend around US$164.6 billion each year on water, with approximately 91% coming from governments and state-owned enterprises and less than 2% from private sources. Projects such as flood protection and catchment restoration can generate significant public benefits without producing the revenue needed to repay private investors. Cape Town offers one example of how this gap can be addressed. Clearing invasive vegetation from seven priority catchments was estimated to cost one-tenth as much per unit as alternatives such as desalination. A R2.5 billion (South African rand) performance-based bond issued in 2026 also links part of investor returns to independently verified restoration outcomes. Where there is no commercial payer, public budgets and grants remain a legitimate and necessary source of finance.

Planning for the next disaster: Household preparedness in the Houston area

Most Houston-area residents feel ready for the next disaster, but levels of preparedness vary substantially by income. Using measures from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Household Survey, the Kinder Institute assessed household preparedness in spring 2026 across Harris County and, for the first time, Fort Bend and Montgomery counties. The average resident has taken five of the ten preparedness actions FEMA tracks, such as signing up for weather alerts and insuring their property. Four in ten own a generator that can power their home through extended outages, but ownership varies sharply by neighbourhood and income. That matters in a city where millions lost power after Hurricane Beryl in 2024. Higher-earning households feel more prepared and take more preparedness actions, while nearly half of residents in households earning under US$25,000 a year said they would be not at all prepared or not too prepared if a disaster struck. The researchers point to community organisations to help lower-income residents prepare, alongside staying connected to alerts and local networks year-round.

World Risk Poll 2026: From alert to agency: What turns warnings into action

Four in five adults who experienced a disaster in the previous five years received at least one advance warning, but more than a third of those warned were unable to take any protective action. Drawing on more than 143,000 Gallup interviews across 140 countries and territories, Lloyd’s Register Foundation’s report examines exposure to disasters, access to warnings and the ability to act on them. Preparation at home makes a striking difference: 83% of warned adults with both a household disaster plan and a sense of personal agency took action, compared with just 27% of those with neither. Warning coverage reached 64% in low-income countries compared with 84% in upper-middle and high-income countries. At the regional level, Australia and New Zealand recorded the highest regional share of adults reporting disaster impacts, at 31%. The report calls for mobile-based warnings, stronger household preparedness and priority for highly exposed communities with poor warning access.

Strengthening climate resilience through social protection programs

When disaster strikes, the households most at risk are often those least able to absorb the shock. Adaptive social protection links social protection with disaster risk management and climate adaptation, building poor and vulnerable households’ capacity to anticipate, absorb and adapt to shocks so they don’t fall into, or become trapped in, poverty. This Asian Development Bank brief shows what that looks like in practice in Bangladesh, a low-lying deltaic country with 13% of its territory less than 2 metres above sea level. Reforms to its Employment Generation Program for the Poorest, a public works scheme supporting around 400,000 people, now match permitted works to each district’s dominant climate stress, align them with local disaster management plans, locate worksites within 3 km of homes so women can take part safely, and speed up wage payments. Community consultations surfaced barriers that desk reviews had missed. The lesson travels well: resilience can be built through existing national programmes rather than standalone interventions.

Perceiving protection: Public interpretation of institutions in managed flood settings

Why do some households prepare for floods while their neighbours, living behind the same levee, do not? This systematic review of 35 studies published between 2010 and 2024, covering levees, dams, reservoirs and drainage infrastructure across 21 countries, finds the answer often lies in how people see the institutions meant to protect them. Six dynamics emerge: infrastructure as a producer of risk, governance fragmentation and public confusion, preparedness as an interpretive practice, trust and the levee effect, fairness and timing in institutional response, and whether institutions communicate in ways people can recognise. The central finding is that preparedness is not driven solely by risk knowledge or hazard experience, but reflects how institutional action is seen, trusted or contested. For anyone designing flood protection, how it is perceived may matter as much as how well it performs.

19th Congress of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (IUMS 2026)

Microbes rarely feature in disaster risk conversations, yet they underpin food security, carbon sequestration, ecosystem restoration and public health. The 19th IUMS Congress brings together scientists working across bacteriology, virology and mycology under the theme “Beyond the Microscope: AI & Innovation in Microbiology”. Alongside microbial genetics, synthetic biology and clinical science, the programme covers applied microbiology for environmental sustainability, with a strong emphasis on preserving ecosystems and oceans. Listed by the International Science Council, the congress also aims to widen participation from both low- and high-income countries. It sits at the edge of the DRR agenda but is worth following for anyone working where ecosystem health, biological hazards and resilience meet.

Date & location: 4 – 6 November 2026 | Lisbon, Portugal

World Tsunami Awareness Day 2026

In 2011, only 5 of roughly 2,900 elementary and junior-high students in Kamaishi, Japan, died when the Great East Japan tsunami struck, an outcome credited to years of tsunami education and regular drills. This year’s World Tsunami Awareness Day picks up the same thread under the theme “Be Tsunami Ready: Resilience starts with you”. Because waves can arrive before official warnings do, the campaign focuses on recognising natural warning signs, moving immediately to high ground, knowing evacuation routes, preparing household plans, and helping those who need extra support, including children, older people, persons with disabilities and tourists. Events are being held worldwide, and UNDRR is inviting organisations to share their own #GetToHighGround activities.

 Date & location: 5 November 2026 | Global

UN Climate Change Conference (COP31)

The world’s only multilateral decision-making forum on climate change will meet in Antalya. Türkiye’s Murat Kurum has been nominated as COP President, with Australia’s Chris Bowen serving as President of Negotiations. The conference follows October’s Pre-COP, which was hosted in the Pacific by Fiji, Tuvalu and Australia. Negotiators will focus on limiting warming to 1.5°C, helping vulnerable communities adapt and reaching net zero. Adaptation tracking will be under close scrutiny after COP30 in Belém adopted 59 indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation. Business leaders, scientists, Indigenous Peoples and civil society representatives will also join official delegations. Those following the conference remotely can access a daily schedule of events on the UNFCCC website.

Date & location: 9 – 20 November 2026 | Antalya, Türkiye

OpenET Applications Conference 2026

How much water is actually leaving fields, forests and cities through evapotranspiration? OpenET uses satellite data to answer that question at field scale, and this conference brings its user community together with the science and technical teams to share how the data is being put to work. Under the theme “Science & Innovation to Support Sound Water Management”, sessions run across five tracks: accuracy, natural and urban landscapes, regional management, drought and conservation, and on-farm management. The goals are to share lessons across regions and sectors, gather feedback on what users need from the data, and spark new partnerships. Registration details are available on the conference website.

Date & location: 17 – 18 November 2026 | Hyatt Regency, Salt Lake City, USA

Reducing Drought Risk through Prevention, Early Warning and Anticipatory Action

With El Niño-related drought conditions adding pressure on water security, livelihoods and ecosystems, this UNDRR event in Abu Dhabi, held during the 2026 UN Water Conference, looks at how prevention, early warning and anticipatory action can reduce drought risk and accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goal 6. It draws on the Sendai Framework and the 2026 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, which explores the links between drought, floods and food systems. Discussion will centre on partnerships between governments, UN entities, scientific institutions and development partners to strengthen risk-informed water management and drought preparedness. Ministerial representation and high-level participation are expected.

Date & location: 9 December 2026 | ADNEC Centre, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

September 2026: Publications in the Data Science Journal

Title: What Do We Mean by ‘Version’? Actionable Guidelines for the Versioning of Data
Author: Jens Klump, Lesley Wyborn, Mingfang Wu, Dorothea Strecker, Heinz Pampel, Laura Rothfritz
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-037
Title: Toward a Standardized Framework for Benthic Mapping Data and Metadata Integration in Florida
Author: Anna E. Braswell, Vincent Lecours, Xiaohui Qiao, Ana Carolina Peralta Brichtova, Steven D. Meyers, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Brad E. Rosenheim, Brian K. Walker, Gary A. Zarillo, René Baumstark, Yonggang Liu, Dave Reed, Sean Beckwith, John M. Jaeger
URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-036

Disaster Risk Reduction and Open Data Newsletter: September 2026 Edition

Nepal floods: how measuring snow in the Himalayas could help avoid future disasters

The August 2026 glacial flood that killed more than 1,000 people on the Nepal–Tibet border has renewed urgent calls to close a critical knowledge gap: scientists still do not know precisely how much water the Himalayas hold, or how fast that is changing. Home to nearly 90,000 glaciers sustaining ten major river systems, the region underpins the food, energy and water security of six nations. New measurement techniques, including airborne glacier surveys and satellite radar measurements, are emerging, but deployment remains too slow and too sparse. Researchers argue this must be treated with the urgency of a public emergency, with scientific innovation matched by coordinated monitoring networks, cross-border data sharing, and Indigenous knowledge.

Water investments, capital mobilisation, and national water compacts

Capital for water investment exists; the challenge is creating the conditions to deploy it well. Speaking to The Water Diplomat, Dr Bapon Fakhruddin of the Green Climate Fund and Sarah Nedolast of the World Bank’s Global Water Security and Sanitation Partnership argue the real bottleneck is alignment between policy, regulation and financing, and turning national plans into bankable projects. Too often the same projects are funded repeatedly without shifting the paradigm. Nedolast notes only 70% of public water funding gets spent, so building skills and preparing projects must come first. National Water Compacts show countries are committed to this. Fakhruddin sees grounds for optimism: countries are now asking about blended finance, which was not happening five years ago.

Rising sea levels could cost Australians at least $855 billion by 2100

Rising sea levels and storm surges could inflict A$855 billion in economic losses across Australia by 2100, according to landmark research from the University of Melbourne and Australian National University published in Nature Scientific Reports. Under a moderate-emissions scenario, nearly 270,000 properties and two million hectares of land are at risk, with Queensland, Western Australia, and Victoria bearing the heaviest losses. The Gold Coast alone faces A$84.4 billion in projected damages. Critically, these figures are conservative: rapid ice sheet collapse and erosion losses are excluded entirely. Researchers warn that the cheapest option available now is straightforward: stop building in the highest-risk zones.

Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) Version 1.1 Now Final

When questions span multiple disciplines, domain-specific standards fall short of what is needed for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data exchange. The Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) addresses this by establishing a common language for cross-domain metadata exchange, built on existing standards and complementing, rather than replacing, those already in use.

After the initial release of the CDIF version 1.1 Profiles in June, and a subsequent round of testing and implementation, they have now been finalised. The release will henceforth be stable, with all further issues and features addressed in subsequent versions. It is available at https://book.cdif.org/ and https://github.com/Cross-Domain-Interoperability-Framework.

Smarter, faster, better: Building New Zealand’s energy future

New Zealand’s energy infrastructure pipeline is growing, but delivery remains too slow and costly. Glen Nicholson, Chris Perks and James Russell of Tonkin + Taylor argue the problem is method, not volume: teams repeatedly recreate designs and specifications while constructors join too late, surfacing access and supply-chain problems at their most expensive.

The authors call for four shifts: publishing a visible forward programme of works; standardising repeatable design inputs; testing logistics at business case stage; and involving constructors before design closes. Resilience must be embedded from the outset, and the Edgecumbe and Canterbury earthquakes show it pays. Getting energy policy right could add NZ$22 billion a year to GDP by 2035; delivery will decide whether New Zealand captures those gains.

Cape Town’s day zero: How a water crisis built a data-driven city

Nearly a decade after Cape Town came within days of becoming the first major city to run dry, the crisis still offers lessons for fast-growing cities worldwide. Speaking on VoxDevTalks, senior city official Hugh Cole reflects that the two most effective interventions were public communications and network pressure management, not desalination or tariff hikes. More enduringly, the crisis forced Cape Town to rebuild its entire data infrastructure, embedding evidence-based decision-making across city services from water to its COVID-19 response. With climate change increasing drought risk globally, Cole’s message is clear: cities cannot afford to wait for a crisis to start treating data as a public resource.

Harmful information in disasters: Risk communication for safer decisions (Guidance note)

Misinformation and disinformation now rank as the top global risk, and they strike fastest in disasters, where confusion, fear and slow institutional communication create a vacuum for false narratives to fill. This 2026 guidance note from the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction gives communicators and practitioners a practical framework for managing harmful information, from rumours and scams to AI-generated deepfakes, across the disaster cycle. The goal is to reduce harm, not control information, and not every rumour deserves a response. Before a crisis, the work is building trust and partnerships. During one, communicators should pre-emptively warn people about manipulation tricks, communicate uncertainty with “known / unknown / next update” formats, and triage by Reach, Risk and Resonance to decide whether to act, monitor or stay silent. Afterwards, an after-action review closes the loop. The core message: slow approval processes are not just bureaucratic friction but a risk factor.

The Community Capacity Co-design Process (C3P): A framework for hyperlocal community-led disaster preparedness

Most disaster preparedness programmes hand communities a ready-made plan and tell them to follow it. This paper argues that approach misses the point: every neighbourhood has different risks, skills and histories that a one-size-fits-all curriculum often fails to reflect. The authors developed the Community Capacity Co-design Process (C3P), a seven-step framework that puts communities in the driver’s seat: rather than being trained, residents map their own hazards, identify local strengths and gaps, and design a response plan that fits their reality. Built around trauma-informed principles, it is designed to be emotionally safe for people who have already lived through disasters. Tested across seven communities in Australia, Brazil and New Zealand, the framework was well received, with 97% of participants rating activities positively. The authors acknowledge the need for longer-term follow-up to confirm whether communities sustain what they co-designed.

Changes in glacial lakes and associated risks in the China‒Nepal Himalayas

This study presents a quantitative glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risk assessment for the China–Nepal Himalayas (CNH), a transboundary region of 221,876 km² where trade infrastructure and local communities face growing ice-related hazards. Mapping 2,377 glacial lakes across four time periods using Landsat imagery, the authors document a 27% expansion in lake area between 1992 and 2022, driven by accelerating glacier retreat. A machine learning model, trained on High Mountain Asia GLOF records, reliably identified all nine historically documented outburst lakes in the CNH. Downstream, 260 km of roads, 9.35 km of bridges and nine hydropower facilities are exposed. Of 76 potentially dangerous glacial lakes identified, four were classified as very high risk: Peace Lake, Tilicho Lake, Jialong Co and Poiqu No.1. The framework is designed to be transferable to other data-scarce mountain regions.

When climate forces people to move: Bridging the gap between global frameworks and local action

Climate change is not just warming the planet: it is moving people and trapping others in place. Drawing on nearly a decade of field experience across the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Fiji and the Philippines, this practitioners’ brief tackles the gap between global promises on climate migration and practice on the ground. Climate mobility sits between adaptation, disaster risk, migration and development mandates, and often falls through the cracks between them. Five lessons emerge: build climate mobility into permanent government systems rather than time-limited projects; use data that drives decisions; learn from pilots such as Fiji’s rights-based relocation guidelines; provide dedicated funding, as existing climate finance is largely inaccessible to affected communities; and sustain cross-regional peer learning. In fragile contexts such as the Horn of Africa, climate mobility cannot be separated from conflict, food insecurity and humanitarian needs.

An AI-ready, data engineering playbook for FAIR Integration in EOSC and beyond: CDIF4EOSC Workshop, London, Friday 9 October

Co-located with the Research Data Alliance 27th Plenary Meeting, this workshop showcases the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework for the European Open Science Cloud (CDIF4EOSC) project’s effort to turn the CDIF into a practical playbook for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data integration across the EOSC. Three use cases anchor the work, ocean sciences, climate adaptation, and sustainable materials development, supported by AI-assisted FAIRification tools and partnerships including the Australian Research Data Commons. Sessions cover CDIF tutorials, federated infrastructure, AI-readiness, access rights, and data quality. In-person registration has now closed, but the event is still worth following.

Date & location: 9 October 2026 | The Long Room, Kia Oval Cricket Ground, London

International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction 2026

Held on 13 October, the 2026 International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction (IDDRR) focuses on how homes are planned, built, financed and maintained as a determining factor in whether risk is reduced or created. Under the theme “Resilience Starts at Home,” the day calls on governments, the private sector and households to act: enforcing risk-informed building codes, expanding access to affordable insurance, and ensuring early warnings and planning processes reach and include everyone. Events are being held around the world throughout October, so keep an eye out, and you can search for ones in your region on the IDDRR website

Date & location: 13 October 2026 | Global

Beijing Science Dialogue & ISC Midterm Meeting

Part of a wider gathering of more than 250 scientific organisations, the International Science Council (ISC) Midterm Members’ Meeting brings together ISC members and Fellows over two days for business and forward planning. Day one opens with category-based member forums, committee meetings, and a full plenary covering secretariat reports, member forum readouts, and reflections from the outgoing President, closing with a gala dinner. Day two centres on the incoming President’s vision for the next four years, discussion with members, and a formal handover. Optional afternoon side events cover funding challenges for international scientific unions and shaping the post-2030 UN agenda for disaster risk reduction.

Date & location: 22 – 23 October 2026 | Beijing, China

Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction 2026 (SIDEX-ACDR2026)

Held under the theme “Future-Proofing Transboundary Climate and Disaster Risk Reduction through Advanced Technologies for a Resilient Society,” this conference focuses on strengthening cross-border collaboration and using advanced technologies to improve risk assessment, early warning and disaster response across the region. Sessions include a roundtable on progress and remaining challenges in implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) 2015–2030, and a technical session on applying digital transformation to disaster risk reduction in isolated and inaccessible communities. Registration is open.

Date & location: 28 – 30 October 2026 | Singapore EXPO Hall 3 / Peridot Room, Singapore

World Cities Day / Urban October

Held annually on 31 October to close out Urban October, World Cities Day 2026 focuses on urban regeneration as a pathway to adequate housing for all. This year’s theme explores how area-based regeneration, combined with strategies for housing and informal settlements, can deliver inclusive, climate-resilient neighbourhoods, with an emphasis on community-led approaches and safeguards that prevent displacement and ensure existing residents benefit. The event is hosted this year in Fuzhou, China.

Date & location: 31 October 2026 | Fuzhou, China